Jevons, Meters. P., and you may Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Roadway., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. M. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Alive, We., and you can Nichols, An excellent. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, A beneficial. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Yards. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and Williams, R. Age. 0. (1958). step three. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Meters., Plotkin, S. A beneficial., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and you can Pidcoe, V. (1960). Technology, Letter.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Meters. T. (1966). During the “New Scientific Base out of Treatments Annual Comment” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. College out of London, New Athlone Push, London area. Parker, Yards. T., Todinson, A good. J. H., and you can Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
The brand new parasexual years and its include in hereditary study
Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a great d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and you may Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 25, 116-123. Statement (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,9, 115-118. Report (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., tendermeets-coupon thirteen, 119-122. Report (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Report (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Meters. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. M., and you will Asheshov, E. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty-six, 111-122. Rountree, P. M., and Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, A great. C., and Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty-five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you can Wilson, J. B. (1958). In the morning.step 3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Street. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Street. Buc
Tarr, H. An effective. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. A great. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. R., and Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.
Williams, R. Age. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., and Jevons, Meters. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., We Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. Age. O., and you may Rippon, J. Elizabeth. (1952). J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, R. E. O., Rippon, J. Age., and you can Dowsett, L. Yards. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and you may Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, i, 647-649.
Genetic Study within the Small-organisms DAVID An excellent. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, England We. Inclusion . eleven. Segregation since Proof Simple Hereditary Manage . Good. New genetic way of biology . B. The newest identification out of segregation . 111. The foundation of Hereditary Mapping . B. The new sequencing from loci towards the a good linkage chart: multi-basis crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic great-structure . E. Deletion mapping . IV. Useful Genetic Assessment . A beneficial. Prominence tests . Bplementation assessment . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Research in the Eukaryotic Microorganisms . A great. Standard factors . step 1. 2. Tetrad analysis . B. Genetic investigation particularly bacteria step one. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger or other “imperfect” fungus step 3. Neurospora crassa . cuatro. Other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . six. Filamentous basidiomycetes . seven. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Hereditary Investigation when you look at the Prokaryotes . An excellent. Standard factors . 1. Virility versions and you may conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and you will co-transduction . step 3. Conversion and you will co-conversion process 4. Non-choosy data .
fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Watson, W
Hereditary data in particular organisms step 1. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or other Enteric micro-organisms . dos. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you can Ps. putida . step 3. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor or other actinomycetes . 5. Most other germs C. Certified mapping actions separate off recombination VII. Genetic Data for the Viruses A beneficial. General considerations . step one. Kind of viral genomes 2. Special features of malware genes B. Hereditary analysis specifically worms 1. Bacteriophages dos. Creature viruses 3. Plant worms VIII. Finishing Remarks Recommendations .