We also seen conceptual resemblances within Filipino dimensions having societal roles and you may outcomes and lots of regarding Goldberg’s (1982) conceptually-derived categories for public spots, relationship, and outcomes from the English code. Particularly, Filipino Prominence generally seems to involve words during the Goldberg’s Magnificence, Determine, Popularity, and Affluence kinds. Filipino Uselessness (inversely) is much like Goldberg’s Competence class. Close abstract correspondences are obvious anywhere between Filipino Elegance and you can Goldberg’s Appeal, and you can ranging from Filipino Respectability and you may Goldberg’s Admiration. Filipino Charisma appears to cover the majority of Goldberg’s Interest, Attraction, and you may Enjoyment-worthy of categories, and several words inside Goldberg’s Attract class plus convergence which have Filipino Individuality. Filipino Dangerousness is comparable to Goldberg’s Dominance, Fearsomeness, and you will Antagonism kinds, and you can Filipino Destructiveness as well as overlaps which have Goldberg’s Antagonism. Needless to say, a couple Filipino dimensions which might be laid out generally by actual feature terms and conditions, Stamina and Presentableness, don’t seem to coincide directly to the away from Goldberg’s kinds of social jobs and you will effects (regardless if Goldberg’s Trend category boasts “presentable” just like the an expression). We should note that we failed to just be sure to create marker scales having Goldberg’s (1982) abstract categories in addition to their worry about-statement framework about English language is not familiar. Overall, but not, our very own conceptual evaluation means that you will https://datingmentor.org/pl/randki-w-40/ find a large amount of cross-social similarity regarding major kinds of public opportunities and you may effects, and therefore a number of Goldberg’s a whole lot more delicate abstract kinds might merge toward wider size inside the care about-declaration analysis.
A good amount of Goldberg’s reduced kinds, including Nurturance, Succorance, Changes, Understanding, Liability, Forgivability, Style, Politics, Sex, and you may Religion don’t showcase far conceptual resemblance into Filipino proportions of societal and you can bodily attributes
Using joint part and you will regression analyses, we indicated that the societal and you can bodily attribute proportions have been modestly so you’re able to strongly related no less than one Filipino characteristic and you may evaluative dimensions. The clearest exception to this rule was the tiny Presentableness dimension. Inspite of the identity-benefit judgments your Filipino informants, the Presentableness aspect, that was made up of appearance functions (elizabeth.grams., respectable, brush versus. dirty), may possibly provide shorter factual statements about character as compared to other personal and you will bodily attribute size. As well, the fresh new Prominence and you may Attractiveness size-over another personal and you will bodily trait size-frequently target qualities which can be fairly line of conceptually regarding Filipino attribute and you may evaluative dimensions.
The correlations located anywhere between all the personal proportions additionally the trait feature dimensions suggest that terms and conditions to have social positions, statuses, and you can effects get reflect social outcomes of this sort of personality traits. In reality, Angleitner et al. (1990) ideal you to social spots and you may statuses reflect this new perception that faculties has to the other people. Like, Filipinos with Gregariousness qualities are likely to be described from the on their own although some with regards to the public functions define new Charm aspect (age.grams., causes pleasure or delight). Likewise, Filipinos that have Conscientiousness attributes are likely to be demonstrated inside the terms of Respectability social features (e.grams., recognized, honorable). These you can easily links anywhere between characteristics and you can personal reputations would-be looked at in direct future research from the correlating care about-evaluations for the attribute dimensions which have observer evaluations toward personal and you will actual characteristic proportions.
Particularly, given the relationships of thinking-identified attractiveness to subjective really-becoming (Diener, Wolsic, & Fujita, 1995), and the body image to one another thinking-value and you can dining conditions (Mintz & Betz, 1988), new Attractiveness dimensions you’ll promote an essential introduction inside systematic assessment
An applied implication of our own overall performance is that not very much might possibly be forgotten from the assessing just the Filipino attribute and you will evaluative proportions. Indeed, because of the outcome of the brand new joint component research ( Table 2 ), some terms for public and you will bodily attributes can also be extra so you’re able to established feature and you can evaluative balances. not, if a person would be to add extra dimensions, outside of the feature and you may evaluative proportions, the most likely people is Prominence and you may Attractiveness. The newest Stature measure would evaluate notice-identified social status otherwise standing, once the Attractiveness size perform evaluate thinking-observed physical elegance and you may appeal.